Documentation
Everything we would want to read first.
Architecture, connectors, agents, envelopes, autonomy, the twin and the audit schema. Written for the process engineer, the OT lead and the change-control board — in that order.
Start here
Getting started
-
01
Architecture overview
The three tiers — cloud or private control plane, fab-edge runtime, line tier — and the trust boundaries between them.
-
02
The autonomy model
Shadow, assist, bounded autonomy and supervised autonomy: what each gate requires, how it is measured and how it is withdrawn.
-
03
Action envelopes
Authoring, versioning and approving the bounds within which any agent may act on a tool.
-
04
Deployment
Fab-edge hardware sizing, cluster installation, network segmentation, SSO configuration and release pinning.
Connectors
Talking to the line
- 01 SECS-GEM / HSMS
Session setup, variable and event discovery, collection-event subscription, remote command mapping and fail-safe behaviour.
- 02 OPC-UA
Node discovery, subscription models, security policies and write-path constraints for tools exposing OPC-UA instead of SECS-GEM.
- 03 Vendor APIs
REST and gRPC integration patterns for bonders, aligners, inspection systems and testers with proprietary interfaces.
- 04 Inspection data
X-ray, CT, SAM and AOI ingestion by stream or monitored drop, including volume handling and retention.
- 05 MES, YMS and PLM
Lot, package, recipe, route and disposition context in; verified outcomes and dispositions back out.
- 06 Connector SDK
The interface contract for building a connector to a tool Chipira does not yet cover: telemetry, actions, envelopes and failure semantics.
Agents
Reference by capability
-
01
Place-and-Bond
Alignment metrology inputs, force, temperature and time profile control, envelope parameters and accuracy gates.
-
02
Stack-and-TSV
Known-good-die sequencing, TSV and underfill planning, stack-order optimisation and twin pre-validation.
-
03
Warpage-and-Defect
Volumetric and surface perception across X-ray, CT, SAM and AOI; classification schema, confidence and evidence.
-
04
Mold-and-Underfill
Flow, pressure and cure control, warpage prediction inputs and material-lot conditioning.
-
05
Substrate-Handling
Robotic handling policies, particle and contamination avoidance, and fail-safe stop semantics.
-
06
Test-and-Bin
Final-test signal fusion, binning policy, disposition write-back and reliability-risk scoring.
-
07
Yield-and-Ramp
Cross-source correlation, root-cause hypothesis generation, ramp recommendation and retraining triggers.
Reference
The action envelope
An envelope is a versioned, signed document owned by your process engineers. It is the single artifact that determines what any agent may do to any tool. Nothing executes outside it — not in an incident, not for support, not ever.
id: bond-line4
version: 12
owner: process-integration@fab-kh-04
tools: [bonder-4a, bonder-4b]
autonomy: L3 # bounded autonomy
requires_twin: true
parameters:
bond_force_n: { min: 18.0, max: 24.0, max_step: 0.4 }
bond_temp_c: { min: 220, max: 265, max_step: 3 }
dwell_ms: { min: 400, max: 1200, max_step: 50 }
placement_offset_um: { min: -0.6, max: 0.6 }
conditions:
- require: twin.verdict == "in_spec"
- require: agent.rolling_accuracy >= 0.99
- escalate_if: package.value_tier == "critical"
on_breach: { action: fail_safe_stop, notify: [shift-lead, process-owner] }
approved_by: [m.oyelaran, k.tanaka]
Illustrative envelope. Parameters and ranges are per line and per package family.
Autonomy levels
What each gate means
- L1 · Shadow
- Perception and proposals only. No write path exists. Used to establish a measured baseline against your current practice.
- L2 · Assist
- Proposals become one-click approvals in the console or via the API. Every approval and rejection is captured as supervised training data.
- L3 · Bounded autonomy
- Low-risk moves execute automatically inside the envelope, twin-validated, when the agent’s rolling accuracy holds above its gate.
- L4 · Supervised autonomy
- The closed loop runs the workflow, with humans on exceptions and escalations only. Reserved for workflows with a long measured record.
- Revocation
- Any level is withdrawn instantly by your organisation, and automatically when rolling accuracy falls below the gate’s floor.
Audit schema
Fields in every record
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ts | timestamp | UTC, millisecond precision, assigned at the edge. |
| agent | string | The capability that produced the record. |
| model | string | Immutable model release identifier, semantically versioned. |
| tenant | string | Site-scoped tenant. Records never cross tenants. |
| subject | object | Package, lot, tool and process step under evaluation. |
| grounding | array | Sources and locators cited by the proposal. |
| twin | object | Twin verdict and predicted outcome, where a twin was consulted. |
| envelope | string | Envelope identifier and version the action was checked against. |
| action | object | Proposed or executed action, with its autonomy level. |
| approval | object | Mode, approver and timestamp where a human was involved. |
| verified | object | Downstream verification result closing the loop. |
| immutable | boolean | Always true. Records cannot be edited or deleted. |
Operations
Running Chipira day to day
Release management
Pinning, staged rollout, per-site channels and rollback. No production line receives an update it did not schedule.
Monitoring
OpenTelemetry traces, metrics and logs into your existing observability stack, plus agent-level accuracy and drift dashboards.
Evaluation
Golden datasets, LLM-as-judge scoring and regression gates that block a release when accuracy moves the wrong way.
Incident response
Fail-safe semantics, escalation routing, and a post-incident report grounded in the immutable audit trail.
Access reviews
Periodic review of roles, envelope ownership and approver lists, exportable for your compliance programme.
Model review
A scheduled review of agent accuracy, drift, exception rate and autonomy levels with your process owners.
Process integration leadIDM back-endDocumentation that admits what the system cannot do is the only kind worth reading.
Composite drawn from design-partner and industry conversations. Illustrative, not a customer endorsement.
Documentation
Access and scope
-
No. Architecture, security and API documentation is provided under NDA to prospective design partners and customers, because it describes deployment specifics we would rather discuss than publish.
-
Yes, to customers and design partners, alongside the connector interface contract and the audit schema.
-
Yes, and they should. The fail-safe and envelope-breach behaviour documentation is written specifically for that review.
-
Continuously — the product is pre-launch. Every documented interface carries a stability marker so you know what is safe to build against.
Start narrow, expand relentlessly
Land one workflow. Own the loop.
A Chipira engagement begins with a single wedge workflow, a shadow-mode baseline and one signed success metric. Everything after that is expansion.